Time-in-market is a trust signal. Operators that survived a full crypto cycle (5+ years) have proven they can pay rent, ship bug fixes, and handle disputes without disappearing. Fresh launches under 2 years are listed with extra caveats until they accumulate operating history.
Each operating_since year combines three independent signals. We never stamp a year from a single source — and when sources disagree we either pick the most-conservative one or surface the conflict in a tenure_note.
Known traps we explicitly guard against (caught publicly by Monerica + Jaun on 2026-05-28 — thanks):
crypto.com 1993 ≠ Crypto.com project 2016. kagi.com 1993 ≠ Kagi search 2018. Pre-2000 WHOIS years are always cross-verified.youtube.com, reddit.com, github.com WHOIS year ≠ the channel/subreddit/repo creation year. Our probe refuses to auto-write when the linked domain is a shared platform.Full methodology + verification cadence: /methodology
Survived a full crypto cycle. Operators with rent paid, bug fixes shipped, disputes handled.
Through one bear market. Strong stability signal but not yet veteran-grade.
Past the launch-and-vanish window. Track record exists but is shorter than a cycle.
Listed with extra caveats. Honest about the lack of operating history.
Operating-since date not yet recorded or not verifiable.