B2P Central

What it is. Read-only aggregator that indexes P2P Bitcoin offers across the major fiat-to-BTC venues (HodlHodl, Bisq, RoboSats, and others) plus a swap-rate finder that fans quotes out across multiple swap services and returns the best headline rate for a given pair. No account, no signup, no login. The service itself doesn't touch funds — it's a comparison surface that hands you off to the actual venue.

Category posture. This is a Bitcoin-first tool — the P2P side is exclusively BTC, and the swap side compares rates against providers that mostly cover BTC pairs. XMR relevance is second-order: it's whatever XMR-supporting swap services happen to be in the compared set. If you're looking specifically for BTC → XMR swap discovery, the tool covers it as a pair among many; if you want a Monero-native swap comparison, this is not the primary tool.

Data collection. The homepage states plainly: *"The protection of your personal data is your priority, not ours. This service is 100% free, 0% cookie, 0% tracker."* No visible advertising, no analytics scripts loaded on the initial render. A public API is offered for programmatic access to the latest buy/sell offers.

Peer position. kycnot.me lists at 7/10 (community-contributed). monerica has not yet indexed. Only one peer-directory anchor.

Funding model. Non-commercial framing — the operator asks for Nostr Zaps, Lightning tips (`b2p-central@btcpay.nisaba-solutions.com`), Geyser follows, and referral clicks. Also publishes a BTCPay plugin for merchants. No listed corporate entity on the homepage.

Why Grade C. New exchange-adjacent listings default to C on xmr.club regardless of how clean the publishable surface looks — the loss-asymmetry rule applies even when the tool itself is read-only, because readers who click through to a compared P2P venue are still going to move money based on our positioning of the aggregator. kycnot 7/10 is a mid-tier community score, monerica hasn't picked it up, and there's no operator identity beyond the Lightning address. Path to B: monerica corroboration, a second peer-directory listing, and a curator observation window on the API's uptime + rate-accuracy vs the underlying venues.

Reader caveats. (a) Positioning as a *"Bitcoin private trading"* tool is accurate — this is not a Monero-first surface. (b) The compared providers include venues we do and don't list; the aggregator's coverage is independent of our directory's grades. (c) A tool like this is only useful if its rate data is current — worth spot-checking a quote against the underlying venue before you actually trade any meaningful size.