xmr.club
EN 中文 ES RU
★ FRONT-PAGECDexsport— Web3 crypto sportsbook + casino since 2021, No-KYC, accepts XMR (+38 coins). Read first: documented cancelled-winnings /→
/exchanges · verified 2026-05-23

SplitNOW

C

Aggregator that routes XMR through CEX partners (Bybit, WhiteBIT, Gate) to USDT splits across up to 100 destination wallets. Web3-wallet signin, no Web2 KYC. Hidden spread above the user-visible quote.

Maintainer: SplitNOW

Incident timeline

  1. 2026-10-02auto SplitNOW announced on 2026-09-24 an extended outage after Russian strikes on Ukrainian data-centre infrastructure hosting clearinghouse systems, claiming no funds were lost and a return within days. It resumed operations on 2026-09-26 and says it is migrating data to new redundant infra; API users must create new ke…

At a glance

Grade
C
KYC posture
anonymous signup
Fees
Effective ~3–8% depending on deposit size and split count. Operator claims 1% service + ~0.2% CEX. Tested gap: 3.06% silent swap spread + 141% markup on the destination CEX withdrawal fee, neither surfaced in the pre-deposit quote.
Last verified
2026-05-23
Operating since
2025 · 1y — operating_since estimated from about-page heuristic; WHOIS and archive.org both returned no signal
Incident
⚠ Active since 2026-05-23 — /incidents
C Why grade C?

Acceptable with reservations. Posture intact but evidence is older, lighter, or the provider sits on a known weakness (custody risk, history of customer-fund freezes resolved, etc.).

Full rubric + 7-step verification walkthrough at /methodology.

curator verdict · bottom line

Curator Verdict & OpSec Breakdown

THE BOTTOM LINE

SplitNOW remains listed for comparative coverage, but carries notable custodial, verification, or track-record caveats that warrant extra user caution.

✓

Proven Strengths

  • ▸ Anonymous account model: no real-name, phone, or government ID required to transact.
⚠

OpSec Trade-offs & Caveats

  • ▸ ACTIVE INCIDENT (2026-05-23): Hidden 3.06% swap spread + 141% withdrawal-fee markup above network cost found in live audit (0.2 XMR test). Support admitted partner-side slippage on small orders and offered manual refund.
  • ▸ Custodial exposure: funds reside temporarily under operator control during processing.
  • ▸ Geographical restrictions: enforces IP blocks against visitors from specific regions or jurisdictions.
  • ▸ Proprietary backend: server-side implementation is closed-source and cannot be independently audited.
  • ▸ Clearnet-only footprint: lacks an official .onion hidden service mirror; exposes visitor network IP unless routed through VPN/Tor.
  • ▸ Fee discrepancy risk: user-visible quotes have historically included undocumented spreads or execution slippage.
  • ▸ Fresh operational history: established recently (2025); limited track record under severe market volatility.

Review

Distinct capability. SplitNOW is the only no-KYC aggregator we've found that splits a single deposit across up to 100 destination wallets in one transaction by routing through centralized exchanges. The closest spiritual analog in our own ecosystem is kyc.rip/dispenser, which spins up a per-session burner wallet in the user's browser and fan-outs to multiple providers from there — same end goal (one input → many outputs across providers), opposite trust model. disperse.rip is a different beast: it executes batch on-chain transfers via a smart contract (or an opt-in custodial WalletConnect-free mode), so it splits at the chain layer, not the exchange layer. The product idea SplitNOW chases — pay payroll, fund ops wallets, rebalance custody without 100 separate trades — is genuinely useful.

Routes that single deposit through centralized exchanges (Bybit, WhiteBIT, Gate, etc.), instant exchangers, and OTC desks before distributing.

Live testing (0.2 XMR / 2 wallets, May 2026): quote shown before deposit did not match what the user received. Decomposed: 3.06% silent swap spread baked into the rate ($2.31), 1.13 USDT-per-address withdrawal-fee markup over the upstream CEX's actual cost ($2.26 across 2 wallets), $1.60 of actual network fees. Effective fee at this scale: 8.19% gross. At realistic 1–2 XMR deposits the fixed surcharges thin out to ~3–4% effective, but the 3.06% spread is amount-independent and by itself contradicts the founder's claimed 1% service fee.

hidden_fees pattern, not "high fees". Higher fees are fine if disclosed upfront — xmr2cex.com is the reference point: openly states a flat 5% on CEX-routed swaps. SplitNOW's user-visible quote understates what the operator keeps. Support has confirmed via Telegram that partner exchanges 'give slightly worse execution on smaller orders' and offered a manual refund 'for the difference' on direct push-back — that is, the spread is recoverable only by users who notice and complain, not built into the quote.

Posture caveats: account creation is anonymous (Web3 wallet signature, no email/phone) but the connected public address is a persistent identifier across sessions; the operator does enforce hardcoded sanctions on Belarus, Cuba, Iran, Russia, Syria (visible in the frontend JS bundle). Backend and SvelteKit frontend are closed-source. UI defaults to Binance/BNB branding even though Binance delisted XMR in 2024 and the actual route is Ethereum ERC-20 — a misleading-network risk for unfamiliar users.

Project age: ~8 months online at the time of audit. Iteration window applies — re-test scheduled if the quote-vs-fill gap is addressed (visible spread on the rate card, withdrawal fee equal to the upstream network cost).

Listed at C for completeness — the multi-wallet feature is unique enough to be worth knowing about, but we don't recommend it as a primary tool until the fee transparency is fixed.

Fees

Effective ~3–8% depending on deposit size and split count. Operator claims 1% service + ~0.2% CEX. Tested gap: 3.06% silent swap spread + 141% markup on the destination CEX withdrawal fee, neither surfaced in the pre-deposit quote.

Live ops data

kyc.rip hasn't routed swaps through SplitNOW yet, so we have no first-party settlement data (typical XMR settlement, slow-tail, confirmations) for it.

Operator? Request integration: @kyc_rip_bot

Integration status does not affect this provider’s grade or review.

Links

Sourced from operator pages — verify identity via more than one channel before trusting time-sensitive instructions.

Audit trail — receipts for the editorial claim

  • ● UPSTREAM Up · HTTP 200 · 709ms · checked 9h ago
  • ○ ONION No .onion mirror listed
  • ✎ MANUAL Last manual verification 2026-05-23 (<180d)

Reviews — moderated · rules

No community reviews yet. Be the first below.

Add a review

Honest, brand-neutral feedback welcome. A curator approves before it appears here. No JS required.

Required: review body. Honest, descriptive reviews get approved within a day. Marketing copy, slurs, or invective get rejected. Per-day cap of 5 submissions per IP.