xmr.club
EN 中文 ES RU
★ FRONT-PAGEAEl Capo— Monero-first private exchange · no KYC, no logs · no records after 30 days. Tor-native with published onion mirror.
/educational · verified 2026-07-08

opsecosint.info

B

10-chapter OpSec + OSINT reference for crypto users. Threat models, wallets, blockchain analysis, phishing, SIM-swap, doxxing — plus interactive quizzes. Solo author, brand-new, hosted on Lovable.

Maintainer: CR1337

CR1337 also runs: Monero.Jobs B · wtf is XMR? B

At a glance

Grade
B ()
Last verified
2026-07-08
Operating since
2026 · 0y
B Why grade B?

Solid pick. Verified working but with a meaningful caveat (UX rough, smaller market, intermediate trust step, partial coverage). Listed because the trade-off is sometimes worth it.

Full rubric + 7-step verification walkthrough at /methodology.

Review

What it is. A structured 10-chapter reference guide for the OpSec and OSINT concerns that hit crypto users specifically — wallets, threat modelling, blockchain analysis, phishing, wallet-drain mechanics, SIM-swap, doxxing, physical threats. Ten chapters split evenly between OpSec (five) and OSINT (five), plus an interactive quiz surface. Cross-crypto by scope; not Monero-exclusive, but the threat-model set is the one a privacy-minded Monero user needs to internalise anyway.

Author. Published by `@CR1337` on X (verified handle) on 2026-07-08. CR1337 is not new to the Monero ecosystem — also runs Monero.Jobs (privacy-first freelance marketplace paid in XMR), wtfisxmr.lol (beginner explainer), and the original XMR 1337 Guide, plus paid partnership content on X. See the maintainer profile at `/who/cr1337` for the full portfolio. The grade below reflects opsecosint.info the site, not the author's broader track record.

What you trust. The guide's editorial choices are clean: honest threat-model framing (*"threat model first"*), a *"verify, then trust"* chapter, an explicit *"plan for failure"* chapter, and an "OpSec habits and maintenance" chapter that pushes the guide past one-off reading into a habit-formation shape. The quizzes double as a comprehension-check surface. What you don't get: a professional peer-review process visible on the site, versioned change history, or a public roadmap.

Grade B (not A). The two other reference guides on xmr.club at this subcategory (Privacy Guides, EFF-SSD) sit at Grade A because of years of content tenure — public commit history, dated revisions, an audit trail readers can follow to verify the guide hasn't quietly drifted. opsecosint.info is a brand-new site with an unproven maintenance cadence, no exposed change log, and a Lovable portability caveat (see below). CR1337's ecosystem track record via Monero.Jobs, wtf-is-xmr, and the XMR 1337 Guide is real, but our grade rubric weights the *content* not the *author* — so a fresh site starts where its own content-tenure starts, at B. Grade lifts on 90 days of visible maintenance cadence (dated chapter revisions or a public change log) or a migration to a portable host with an inspectable history.

Caveats.

  • Hosted on Lovable with a custom `.info` domain — the site is fully dependent on the author's Lovable subscription + DNS delegation staying live. Portability is not proven.
  • Cross-crypto rather than Monero-specific — the threat models apply, but readers looking for XMR-specific tradecraft still need to reach for Monero-native references separately.
  • No exposed change log or version history at time of listing. If you want to know whether a chapter was rewritten between reads, you have to check yourself.

Links

Sourced from operator pages — verify identity via more than one channel before trusting time-sensitive instructions.

Audit trail — receipts for the editorial claim

  • UPSTREAM No probe yet — daily cron at 06:00 UTC
  • ONION No .onion mirror listed
  • MANUAL Last manual verification 2026-07-08 (<7d)

Reviews — moderated · rules

No community reviews yet. Be the first below.

Add a review

Honest, brand-neutral feedback welcome. A curator approves before it appears here. No JS required.

Required: review body. Honest, descriptive reviews get approved within a day. Marketing copy, slurs, or invective get rejected. Per-day cap of 5 submissions per IP.