xmr.club
EN 中文 ES RU
★ FRONT-PAGECOllie Swap— Anonymous Tor-only swap for BTC, BCH, DASH, LTC, XMR — no accounts, own liquidity, PGP-verified operator identity.
/tools · verified 2026-08-28

xmrbid.lol

B

A privacy-clean XMR directory built on the same open/verifiable DNA as xmr.club — public JSON, warrant canary, onion, zero trackers — but the opposite soul: rank is the bid and every listing is self-written. A transparent billboard, not a curated list.

At a glance

Grade
B ()
KYC posture
anonymous signup · no account · no kyc
Last verified
2026-08-28
Operating since
2026-08 · 0y — Domain registered 2026-08-25 (days old at listing). Full transparency suite shipped at launch — warrant canary, takedowns, legal, an open verify repo, an onion mirror, and a verifiable Monero transaction behind every listing's bid. It shares the pay-to-rank concept with outbid.lol, but is a far more substantial, privacy-first build.
Tor mirror
http://xmrbidjvtyuhrdowz5emr66hwncwgziw2wsomsinkjkugfdjem3rsfid.onion
B Why grade B?

Solid pick. Verified working but with a meaningful caveat (UX rough, smaller market, intermediate trust step, partial coverage). Listed because the trade-off is sometimes worth it.

Full rubric + 7-step verification walkthrough at /methodology.

Review

A privacy-clean directory where rank is bought. xmrbid.lol is, architecturally, a close cousin of xmr.club — open, public, machine-readable JSON feeds, a warrant canary, an onion mirror, zero trackers, and "no accounts, no cookies, no logs, no record of who read what." On the privacy-engineering axes it's genuinely excellent, and the sophistication (canary + a public `verify` repo, published prices, and a verifiable Monero transaction behind every listing, all shipped in its first days) points to an experienced privacy operator.

The one axis that flips everything. The two directories share the same transparent, verifiable DNA — but the opposite soul. Here, rank *is* the bid: listings pay Monero to rank higher, and each listing is written by the operator being listed. So the openness is real, but what it makes auditable is a *payment auction*, not an independent judgment. The #1 spot is whoever paid most; every "review" is marketing the listee wrote about themselves.

What that means for you. As a privacy tool, it's clean and honest — it states the pay-to-rank model openly and you can verify the bids. As a *directory*, its output carries no vetting signal: it can't tell you which service is safe, only who spent the most on visibility. Read it as a transparent billboard, not a curated list.

Why B. The clean architecture, onion, canary, no-tracker build, and evident operator competence earn a real grade — this isn't a sketchy site. It's held below A by two things: it's only days old (no track record — the canary is untested, uptime unproven), and, by design, a bought-and-self-written ranking is the one thing that makes a directory's output worthless for trust. A directory's whole value is whether its ranking *means* something; that's the part this model gives away. A-path is months of a held canary + clean uptime — but the pay-to-rank ceiling on vetting-utility stays regardless.

Links

Audit trail — receipts for the editorial claim

  • UPSTREAM No probe yet — daily cron at 06:00 UTC
  • ONION Listed but operator doesn't advertise it (expected for Tor-only services + some clearnets) — xmrbidjvtyuhrdowz5emr66hwncwgziw2wsomsinkjkugfdjem3rsfid.onion
  • MANUAL Last manual verification 2026-08-28 (<7d)

Reviews — moderated · rules

No community reviews yet. Be the first below.

Add a review

Honest, brand-neutral feedback welcome. A curator approves before it appears here. No JS required.

Required: review body. Honest, descriptive reviews get approved within a day. Marketing copy, slurs, or invective get rejected. Per-day cap of 5 submissions per IP.