Public ledger of every directory change — grade bumps, KYC re-tests, sponsorship activations, incident updates. We log it so visitors can verify our claim that the editorial firewall holds.
The list is the product; this is the receipt of how it changes.
Grade B- → B on curator sign-off. Three of five original anchoring caveats resolved by operator in 6-week window: $5K cap → $90K, Onion-Location header set, OrangeFren aggregation confirmed. Review body (en/zh/es/ru) prepended with 2026-07-13 update block; rating.privacy + rating.trust refreshed. Historical B- rationale preserved below update block.
OrangeFren aggregation VERIFIED via /results/0.03/BTC@BTC/XMR@XMR/ — 0trace listed as full quote entry with rate + badges + OF grade 5 (caution/new). All three operator claims from 2026-07-13 email now verified (limits $90K, onion+Onion-Location, OF aggregation). Grade still HELD at B- pending curator sign-off on B- → B bump — recommendation strengthened.
Operator emailed 3 follow-ups. Verified: limits raised $5K→$90K (bundle Max 89910), onion HTTP 200 in 7.8s + Onion-Location header now set. Unverified: OrangeFren aggregation claim (still only in partners row on automated probe; JS-widget form-fill blocked by slim-select black box). Two of four B- anchors resolved; grade HELD pending curator sign-off on B- → B bump.
Added Partnerships mini-section to all 4 review languages (en/zh/es/ru) reflecting 0trace featured-sponsor status on OrangeFren. Framing: sponsorship, not aggregation, not peer-directory review. Reply email sent to partners@0trace.io via curator pipe. Grade held at B-.
Operator emailed partners@0trace.io claiming OrangeFren presence. Verified: 0trace appears in OrangeFren partners row (logo linked via referral URL), NOT as an aggregation quote source and NOT a peer-directory review. Timeline entry documents the partnership honestly. Grade held at B-.
{
"field": "tos",
"summary": "Section 12 'Prohibited use' rewritten: prev allowed declining orders on 'verified illicit activity (sanctioned addresses, blocked wallets, confirmed fraud)' — curr removes screening clause entirely, s",
"url_source": "curated"
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}{
"from_bulk": true
}